She could have been run off the road by another vehicle or was pursued on that rain slick road.
Ever heard of Karen Silkwood?
I want to see a police report, a survey and hear what witnesses have to say.
The newspaper was not a witness to the accident and may have never even gone to the scene.
The simply regurgitate what they are told.
I do not trust any CIA-controlled Mockingbird mass-media.
Not only are they lazy with an SJW agenda drilled into them in J-school they're paid to advance and control the narrative. It's their job.
She was reported to have been driving a Ford Ranger.
Just had a quick look and modern Ford Rangers have "Precollision Assist with Emergency Braking" and may have had "Lane Keep Assist." https://www.ford.com/trucks/ranger/mode ... cy-braking
If this was a modern Ford Ranger the steering and braking are under software control and can be hacked.
Vehicle hacking has been done in proof-of-concept.
And who is the leader and expert in autonomous vehicles?
There may be a software backdoor into the vehicle using over-the-air-updates: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ford ... SKCN18F2BJ
Before I knew her my wife was set to give a very damaging deposition against a major chemical company.
On the road trip there, with her previous husband, "they" tried to run her off the road by chasing them with a large semi.
Her husband began to figure it out, tried to lose them on back roads, but the semi driver continued to follow and attempt to overtake (over-run) them.
She gave her depo, they eventually settled, and a wave of class-actions followed.
Her depo, and the testimony at trial by her expert witnesses, was extremely damaging.
If she had been killed before trial there would have been no cause of action.
Her expert witness was eventually bought off by the company and his damaging published research suppressed.
I have those documents and have considered publishing them.
I know what companies and organizations are capable of and have made two criminal referrals, state and Federal, in my lifetime.
Have you followed the illegal activities of the Monsanto "fusion center" and their threats against independent journalists?
Monsantos' intimidation often came in the form of illegal surveillance, threats of personal harm as well as lawfare.
Google is no better.
They started their intimidation of Zach Vorhies by calling the police.
The video of that is pretty chilling.
Zach has admitted to handing over his entire laptop of Google documents to the DOJ.
Zach knew Misti Vaughn (Epstein) personally.
If I were him I'd always be looking over my shoulder.
It's pretty clear Dr. Robert Epstein royally pissed off HRC if you have read his August tweet storm. http://epsteintweetstorm.com/
Most people who piss off HRC or WJC turn up dead.
Seth Rich anyone?
Twitter shadow-bans news and discussion of Epstien's wife. Why?
Hey @Jack, why is @twitter shadow banning @DrREpstein's tweet about his wife's death?
If this story was believable and not nefarious why would Twitter shadow-ban it?
What would be Twitter's motivation?
Twitter (CIA) don't want you questioning the "official" narrative.
Think that's bullshit?
Project Veritas has video of a Twitter employee who gets those calls admitting it.
This may have been an accident but I would be foolish to think there wasn't a possibility that they're trying to shut Dr. Robert Epstein up and retaliate for his past testimony and research.
People who go to the DOJ against one of the world's most powerful companies whose wife is involved in an a deadly accident deserve a closer look.
Particularly when there is a pile of dead bodies already around HRC and WJC who directly benefit from Google's corruption.
The elites have said they want 95% of us dead.
I believe them.
On that basis alone I don't think I should give them the benefit of the doubt on anything.
Why would they worry about killing Dr. Epstein's wife in retaliation if he was in their way of stealing an election through fraud and deceit?
Stopping that throws a big wrench in their admitted plans for killing us.
We're dealing with pure satanic evil out in the open.