Page 5 of 17

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 3:42 pm
by mediatechnology
Doug we're aware of your seething hatred of him and you're simply not worth arguing with.

For those interested:
Political Health – The Motives of a Very, Very, Political Dr. Fauci…

There’s been a debate about possible political motives surrounding the panic he has created; the massive economic damage he has inflicted; and the conflicting assertions of National Institute of Allergy and Infections Diseases (NIAID) Director Dr. Anthony Fauci.

CTH identifies the motives as sketchy. He appears to use his position to advance theories and yet position himself to avoid scrutiny.

Sometimes within a 24 hour period Fauci will make a statement, then contradict the initial assertion, then attempt to cloud his own conflict with obtuse and wordy explanations. After watching for several weeks, we called it out HERE.

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 6:04 pm
by JR.
mediatechnology wrote:
Wed Mar 18, 2020 7:17 pm
So your brother is under a general shelter in place order or is it due to his age?
This whole thing is a virus and a psy-op wrapped in a big ball of financial reset.
that sounds a little too neat.
Have you seen the video of the naked woman running down the street in LA(?) with a rat in her mouth?
no and please do not share the link....
That level of insanity is a sure-fire sign we've almost reached full collapse into hell.
I think we still have a ways to go... but I am an optimist.


Re: A Love Letter To Hillary Clinton From Anthony Fauci

Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:08 am
by JR.
mediatechnology wrote:
Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:41 pm
A "love letter" from Dr. Anthony Fauci to Hillary Clinton.



Cached: ... linton.pdf

POTUS should not trust Dr. Anthony Fauci or the CDC.
It is possible to be both a political sycophant and respected expert in infectious diseases.

I saw a longer interview last night with Dr Fauci and he appears to know what he is talking about but doesn't exactly put his own neck on the line. He has survived operating in the beltway under different administrations, so knows which side of the toast gets buttered when dealing with large political egos.

Apparently covid-19 is not contracted by kissing ass.....


Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:59 am
by mediatechnology
Dr. Fauci has an agenda and it's not public health.
I saw a longer interview last night with Dr Fauci and he appears to know what he is talking about
He sure does being a co-inventor of the China virus. His agency, in part, under his direction, funded the unlawful gain-of-function bioweapons research at UNC Chapel Hill which was then passed on to China.

Dr. Fauci is protecting his ass.
It is foolish to trust the people that engineered this bioweapon.
We are Dr. Fauci's lab rats.

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 2:26 pm
by mediatechnology
Florida Man with Coronavirus Credits Drug Touted by Trump for Saving His Life
Rio Giardinieri, 52, told Fox 11 Los Angeles that he suffered from a cough, headache, back pain, and fatigue after he caught the coronavirus, which he believes he caught at a conference in New York.

Doctors in South Florida diagnosed him with the coronavirus and pneumonia and put him on oxygen in the intensive care unit (ICU).

More than a week later, doctors said there was nothing more they could do for him, so on Friday evening, Giardinieri said his goodbyes to his wife and three kids.

“I was at the point where I was barely able to speak and breathing was very challenging,” Giardinieri said. “I really thought my end was there.”

Then, a friend forwarded him an article about hydroxychloroquine, a prescription drug used to treat illnesses such as malaria and lupus. Other studies conducted overseas have found it to be a promising treatment for coronavirus, although it has not yet been approved by health officials.

Trump said last week he was asking the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to fast-track its testing of hydroxychloroquine and a similar drug, chloroquine, as a treatment for the coronavirus.

Giardinieri said he got in touch with an infectious disease doctor about hydroxychloroquine.

“He gave me all the reasons why I would probably not want to try it because there are no trials, there’s no testing, it was not something that was approved,” said Giardinieri.

“And I said, ‘Look, I don’t know if I’m going to make it until the morning,’ because at that point I really thought I was coming to the end because I couldn’t breathe anymore,” Giardinieri continued.

The doctor agreed and within 30 minutes, a nurse gave him an IV infusion of the medicine. After receiving the medicine via IV for about an hour, Giardinieri said he felt his heart beating rapidly and had another episode where he could barely breathe.

He added that he was given some Benadryl and other drugs so when he awoke at 4:45 a.m. “It was like nothing ever happened.”

Since the IV infusion, Giardinieri said he has had no fever or pain and can breathe. He added that doctors believe the episodes he experienced were related to his body fighting the virus as opposed to a reaction to the medicine.

Giardinieri had three doses of the medicine since his first dose and hopes to be discharged in five days.

“To me, there was no doubt in mind that I wouldn’t make it until morning,” said Giardinieri. “So to me, the drug saved my life.” ... -his-life/
Big pharma isn't going to like this...

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 4:57 pm
by mediatechnology
"Inaccurate Virus Models Are Panicking Officials Into Ill-Advised Lockdowns"
As U.S. state and local officials halt the economy and quarantine their communities over the Wuhan virus crisis, one would hope our leaders were making such major decisions based on well-sourced data and statistical analysis. That is not the case.

A scan of statements made by media, state governors, local leaders, county judges, and more show many relying on the same source, an online mapping tool called COVID Act Now. The website says it is “built to enable political leaders to quickly make decisions in their Coronavirus response informed by best available data and modeling.”

So why is the organization or seemingly innocent online mapping tool using inaccurate algorithms to scaremonger leaders into tanking the economy? Politics, of course.

Founders of the site include Democratic Rep. Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins and three Silicon Valley tech workers and Democratic activists — Zachary Rosen, Max Henderson, and Igor Kofman — who are all also donors to various Democratic campaigns and political organizations since 2016. Henderson and Kofman donated to the Hillary Clinton campaign in 2016, while Rosen donated to the Democratic National Committee, recently resigned Democratic Rep. Katie Hill, and other Democratic candidates. Prior to building the COVID Act Now website, Kofman created an online game designed to raise $1 million for the eventual 2020 Democratic candidate and defeat President Trump. The game’s website is now defunct.

Perhaps the goal of COVID Act Now was never to provide accurate information, but to scare citizens and government officials into to implementing rash and draconian measures. The creators even admit as much with the caveat that “this model is designed to drive fast action, not predict the future.”

They generated this model under the guise of protecting communities from overrun hospitals, a trend that is not on track to happen as they predicted. Not only is the data false, and looking more incorrect with each passing day, but the website is optimized for a disinformation campaign.

Source: ... lockdowns/

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 5:25 am
by mediatechnology
Prof Who Predicted 500K UK Deaths Now Says Under 20K Will Die, Peak In Two Weeks
Ferguson - whose 'Terrifying' research from just 10 days ago predicted 2.2 million deaths in the US and that the UK would need to be under quarantine for 18 months or more - now says that coronavirus will not overwhelm the UK's ICU beds, and that over 1/2 of those it will kill would have died by the end of the year anyway because they were so old and sick. ... k-two-week
Ferguson was "only" off by a factor of 25 times.

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 7:47 pm
by mediatechnology
Well this story is sure to bring on a Chinese bot storm...(or radardoug)

Hubei Residents Riot After Quarantine Lifted; Police Beaten With Their Own Shield, Cop Cars Overturned
Residents of Hubei province in China teamed up with their local police force to battle the police from neighboring Jiangxi province - who set up a roadblock on the Yangtze River Bridge to prevent the people of Hubei from crossing and returning to work. ... d-cop-cars
I'm wondering how long it will be before the residents of Dallas go to war with Forth Worth.

Re: Pirbright Institute, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Coronavirus Patent and You

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:58 pm
by billshurv
mediatechnology wrote:
Fri Mar 27, 2020 5:25 am

Ferguson was "only" off by a factor of 25 times.
The Paper is very readable, you should try the source rather than the edited highlights. His initial prognosis was for 250k excess deaths in UK if nothing was done. Something was done so the prognosis was improved. However there is still no exit strategy, so the 18 months is still a worry.

It's a shame the government isn't getting different universities to contribute to this, but this is something we've not had to deal with before, so the playbook is still being written.

Of course it will be 9 months before we know who was right...

The Denominator Problem

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 6:04 pm
by mediatechnology
The US is now reporting large numbers of positive cases.

What's not being widely reported are the total number of people in the US who have been tested. (It's now about 150,000-200,000 tests per day.)

While the number of positive cases being reported seem high, without the context of the total number being tested - the denominator of the infection rate - the public is unable to compare this bioengineered Chinese weapon to the common flu.

Hyped positive results, without the much-needed context of negative results, allows the media to create hysteria and gives public officials cover to advance dubious unrelated agendas.

In this piece, beginning at 04:45, a medical manager involved with coordinating China virus testing explains the missing data and how it lowers the actual infection rate: