MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Where we discuss new analog design ideas for Pro Audio and modern spins on vintage ones.
User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by mediatechnology » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:14 pm

I just finished cutting and assembling springs for a client.

Sample sound file: http://proaudiodesignforum.com/content/ ... 5_Demo.mp3

As a kid doing sound in high school and college I always looked for a stairwell, hall or small room that sounded like this.
https://ka-electronics.com

"There's A War On For Your Mind" Banned.Video https://banned.video/

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

The equally-tempered tuning of the MicMix Master Room reverb.

Post by mediatechnology » Wed Mar 13, 2019 6:49 pm

I wanted to provide a mathematical and musical analog to explain the Master Room spring timings.

The equally-tempered musical scale has a ratio between neighboring notes that is equal to the 12th√2 or 1.059463. (plus change)
An octave spans a factor of two - there are 12 notes in each octave.
For example "A4" is 440 Hz; "A4#" is (440 * 1.059463) = 466.16 Hz.
B4 is 1.059463 * A4# or 493.88 Hz.

Open the lid of a piano, hold the damper open and sing into it.
It will be some of the smoothest reverb that you've ever heard.


For smooth reverberation, like that of a piano, the goal is to make the delay timings of the springs equally-tempered in the time domain.
If the springs are equally-tempered in the time domain, they will be equally-tempered in the frequency domain similar to the musical scale.

There's one simple difference: An octave is a ratio of "2."
Springs produce an initial delay we'll call T.
An impulse at the driver will produce an initial impulse in the pickup at T.
That first pulse is reflected off the pickup and back to the driver where it is reflected again back into the pickup.
The initial pulse appears at time T, but the reflected pulse of the second echo has to transverse the length of the spring twice.
The second-order echo appears at time 3T. (T+2T=3T).

An equally-tempered octave has to span a frequency ratio of 2 in 12 steps; an equally-tempered spring reverb has to span a time ratio of 3 with a number of steps equal to the number of springs.


The Master Room XL-305 had 12 springs.
For the twelve springs to span a ratio of 3 in equally tempered steps the ratio is the 12th√3 or 1.0959.

If you take the 13.5 ms delay of the first spring and multiply it by 1.0959 you come up with 14.8 ms.
Multiply the 14.8 by 1.0959 and you get the delay of the third spring.
Repeat the series and you wind up with the same numbers in the original table.

The point is that the Master Room reverb is tuned musically - to an equally-tempered scale.

I've been contacted by a manufacturer who may want to make these in a rack unit similar to the original XL-305. Stay "tuned."
https://ka-electronics.com

"There's A War On For Your Mind" Banned.Video https://banned.video/

emrr
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 11:27 pm
Location: NC, USA
Contact:

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by emrr » Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:53 am

well spotted!
Best,

Doug Williams
Electromagnetic Radiation Recorders

gzifcak
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:07 am

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by gzifcak » Tue Jul 16, 2019 7:50 pm

Finally sharing a photo of the unit I built based on this thread. Thanks so much to Wayne for all the help, tips, pcbs, and for providing this info in the first place! This has become my go-to reverb, I'm having fun putting it on all kinds of different stuff. I'm also really enjoying shortening up the decay by damping the springs with pieces of foam. From what I can tell, while the number of turns determines the delay time, the tension of the springs is what determines the decay. Two of the switches shift the HPF from 600 to 1200 Hz and the other two cut out the longer two tanks so I can easily just manipulate the shorter two for sound effects.

Anyway, if anyone is thinking about trying this project I wholeheartedly recommend it. Cutting the springs was intimidating at first but once I got in the groove it was not that difficult and testing the timings became pretty easy with an impulse and two DAW tracks. I found the Accutronics tanks much easier to work with than the MODs I originally started with.

In the pic you can see that I crammed it all into a cheap 1u enclosure by bolting the sleds together and suspending them from the case with spare bits of spring. I even repurposed one of the reverb trays to hide the electronics so I can safely run it with the springs exposed.
IMG_5004.jpg

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by mediatechnology » Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:47 pm

Great work! Glad you like it. :D

Thanks for the pics.

I remember MicMix installing foam plugs inside the springs.
I don't fully remember why some lines had them and others didn't but I think it was to tame a particular line that was longer than the others.
Are you putting the foam under the springs to damp them or inside the turns?

Accutronics recently explained that the transducers have damping material inside the brass tips to control decay.
Need to re-read the email to see if it was the driver or the pickup.
That's what determines the short, medium and long decays.
I'm still not sure how they visually identify which is which.
I used to recall color dots on the brass tube.
https://ka-electronics.com

"There's A War On For Your Mind" Banned.Video https://banned.video/

gzifcak
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:07 am

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by gzifcak » Thu Jul 18, 2019 1:16 pm

Oh cool, thanks for that info. I've just been sticking little pieces between the springs, which shortens the decay a lot. I've also tried resting some bigger pieces across the top of the springs for less severe damping.

Now that you mention it I may try them underneath and see how it sounds. That might give me more flexibility to adjust the tension with slightly different sizes on the lines.

User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by mediatechnology » Thu Jul 18, 2019 6:57 pm

I found that when the springs are laid out horizontally - like yours - that you can almost play it like an instrument damping some of the springs with your fingers but not others to change the tone.

You might play with using a small block of foam and then moving it between the transducers along the length to see what effect it has.

Were you able to ever find anything that dissolved the glue on the Mods?
Acetone dissolved the lacquer on the Accutronics pretty quickly.
(Where they glue the spring to the hook on the transducers.)
https://ka-electronics.com

"There's A War On For Your Mind" Banned.Video https://banned.video/

gzifcak
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:07 am

Re: MicMix MasterRoom XL-305 Spring Reverb Clone

Post by gzifcak » Tue Jul 30, 2019 2:43 pm

I wasn't able to dissolve the glue on the MODs, so what I did was just cut the coils from the middle and then just re-hook them there. I ended up abandoning them though, I think I broke one off the transducer while doing this and also realized the staggered spring heights wouldn't work as well for me.

Post Reply