Cohen/Transamp output stage

Where we discuss new analog design ideas for Pro Audio and modern spins on vintage ones.
User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 5443
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by mediatechnology »

Gold wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 2:39 pm
JR. wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 1:06 pm If you want to have some fun, do some null testing between your favorite preamps and each other or perhaps even the reference input with preamp wiring inverting.
A null test won’t tell you anything about the dynamic behavior of the transformer. Without quantifying the dynamic behavior you get an incomplete picture of what the preamp is doing in the wild.
Null test with music.

I would null test with music after removing Raytheon RC5534 op amps from SSLs and replacing them with Signetics NE5534s.
A pair of RC5532-equipped channels wouldn't null well with each other and the residual was pretty gritty.
A pair of Signetics 5532 channels would null well and the residual sounded like the attenuated source.
It was pretty convincing for the client to hear the difference.
I couldn't have done this running tone.

I replaced thousands of RC5532s at no charge to the client.
ilya
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by ilya »

So to make sure I did that correctly, here's the crude scheme attached. Is it how 1606 should be connected to the Cohen circuit?
Attachments
Cohen-1606.png
User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 5443
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by mediatechnology »

ilya wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:36 pm So to make sure I did that correctly, here's the crude scheme attached. Is it how 1606 should be connected to the Cohen circuit?
That's it though the polarities on the 1606 are reversed.
The top one is 1606 positive.
ilya
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by ilya »

mediatechnology wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:44 pm That's it though the polarities on the 1606 are reversed.
The top one is 1606 positive.
Well, of course! For some reason I thought those were inverting stages. Doh!
Thanks for spotting this!
User avatar
mediatechnology
Posts: 5443
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Oak Cliff, Texas
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by mediatechnology »

The discrete stage inverts and the op amp which follows it inverts it again.
So its non-inverting overall.
Gold
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:20 pm

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by Gold »

mediatechnology wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:17 pm Null test with music.
Good Idea!
User avatar
JR.
Posts: 3700
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by JR. »

Gold wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 4:18 pm
mediatechnology wrote: Wed Dec 30, 2020 3:17 pm Null test with music.
Good Idea!
I used null testing a lot back last century, not so much lately.

Great for comparing near identical paths, like two console strips, while subtle innocuous path differences can dramatically diminish the null product depth. For revealing sound character of low level intermodulation distortions normally masked by audio and noise floor (like Wayne's example) this can be very revealing.

That said minor frequency response differences will show up in nulls, even inaudible phase shift will diminish null depth. Also look out for simple path delay between digital audio stems.

One final caveat, null testing only reveals that two stems are different, not which is which.

JR
Cancel the "cancel culture", do not support mob hatred.
Gold
Posts: 677
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 5:20 pm

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by Gold »

JR. wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 9:26 am One final caveat, null testing only reveals that two stems are different, not which is which.
In the case of a transformer input microphone preamp vs transformerless pre the one that has artifacts might be preferable in use.
ilya
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: Russia
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by ilya »

Very interesting discussion!
While we're wandering around the subject, I've got one more question. In TA documents, Valley recommend to use tantalums as phantom blocking caps. What's the reason behind this? Why tantalums?
User avatar
JR.
Posts: 3700
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Cohen/Transamp output stage

Post by JR. »

ilya wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 7:40 am Very interesting discussion!
While we're wandering around the subject, I've got one more question. In TA documents, Valley recommend to use tantalums as phantom blocking caps. What's the reason behind this? Why tantalums?
Old advice.... Tantalum caps were generally lower ESR than aluminum caps of the time. Modern high quality aluminum should be fine, or no capcitors like Wayne's design.

JR
Cancel the "cancel culture", do not support mob hatred.
Post Reply