Page 7 of 7

Re: "I Am A Google Deplorable" 855-290-0342

Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 4:16 pm
by mediatechnology
I realize that this thread is about Google but this was just too good to pass up...

Facebook’s Ex-CIA ‘Misinformation Manager’ Declares Support for BLM
Karen Graham, a “misinformation process manager” at Facebook, tasked with managing what the platform deems to be “misinformation,” is openly playing partisan politics by using her Linked In profile to demonstrate her support for the radical Black Lives Matter movement. ... t-for-blm/
Here's the really juicy part:
Prior to working at Facebook, Graham spent over fifteen years at the CIA as an operations officer with the Agency’s Directorate of Operations. Her career at the CIA spanned the years 2004 – 2020, encompassing the entirety of John Brennan’s tenure as Director.
Wow, imagine that, an "ex-CIA" employee working in a US Media/High Tech company.
"Operation Mockingbird" is just some crazy right-wing conspiracy theory. :lol:

The CIA is in EVERY major newsroom folks...

Federal Investigators Are Issuing Warrants for Google to Turn Over Anyone Typing in Certain Search Terms

Posted: Wed Oct 06, 2021 4:42 am
by mediatechnology
Federal Investigators Are Issuing Warrants for Google to Turn Over Anyone Typing in Certain Search Terms ... rch-terms/
The U.S. government is reportedly secretly issuing warrants for Google to provide user data on anyone typing in certain search terms, raising fears that innocent online users could get caught up in serious crime investigations at a greater frequency than previously thought.

In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new “keyword warrants” and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim’s name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows.

Google has to respond to thousands of warrant orders each year, but the keyword warrants are a relatively new strategy used by the government and are controversial.

“Trawling through Google’s search history database enables police to identify people merely based on what they might have been thinking about, for whatever reason, at some point in the past,” Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told Forbes.

“This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation,” she added.

The government said that the scope of the warrants is limited to avoid implicating innocent people who happen to search for certain terms, but it’s not publicly disclosed how many users’ data are sent to the government and what the extent of the warrant requests are.
The US is just as fucked-up as the UK now.